Skip to main content
· 3/22/1995

Duffin v. Idaho Crop Improvement Ass'n

Citations

  • 895 P.2d 1195
  • 126 Idaho 1002
  • 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 133
  • 1995 Ida. LEXIS 40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that absent an exception to the economic loss rule, Idaho cases present “a general rule prohibiting the recovery of purely economic losses in all negligence actions”
  • reversing where lower court failed to recognize limits on the general notion that “purely economic loss cannot be recovered in tort”
  • reversing where lower court failed to recognize limits on the general notion that “purely eco- nomic loss cannot be recovered in tort”
  • “economic loss is recoverable in tort as a loss parasitic to an injury to person or property”
  • “[E]conomic loss is recoverable in tort as a loss parasitic to an injury to person or property.”
  • purchase of defective seed potatoes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trout, McDevitt, Johnson, Silak, Schilling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.