· 3/22/1995
Duffin v. Idaho Crop Improvement Ass'n
Citations
- 895 P.2d 1195
- 126 Idaho 1002
- 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 133
- 1995 Ida. LEXIS 40
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that absent an exception to the economic loss rule, Idaho cases present “a general rule prohibiting the recovery of purely economic losses in all negligence actions”
- reversing where lower court failed to recognize limits on the general notion that “purely economic loss cannot be recovered in tort”
- reversing where lower court failed to recognize limits on the general notion that “purely eco- nomic loss cannot be recovered in tort”
- “economic loss is recoverable in tort as a loss parasitic to an injury to person or property”
- “[E]conomic loss is recoverable in tort as a loss parasitic to an injury to person or property.”
- purchase of defective seed potatoes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trout, McDevitt, Johnson, Silak, Schilling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.