Skip to main content
· 10/15/1889

Duffey v. Willis

Citations

  • 99 Mo. 132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that petitioner’s reliance on representations was unreasonable because statutes provided the correct information
  • finding that petitioner’s estoppel claim faded because her reliance upon representations contrary to the statute was unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barolat, Black, Other, Rat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.