· 10/15/1889
Duffey v. Willis
Citations
- 99 Mo. 132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that petitioner’s reliance on representations was unreasonable because statutes provided the correct information
- finding that petitioner’s estoppel claim faded because her reliance upon representations contrary to the statute was unreasonable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barolat, Black, Other, Rat
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.