Skip to main content
· 1/2/1915

Duffee v. Bankers' Surety Co.

Citations

  • 247 Pa. 17
  • 93 A. 17
  • 1915 Pa. LEXIS 774

Syllabus

<p>Practice, Supreme Court — Appeals—Paper boohs — Statement of question involved — Statement of undue length — Supreme Court Bule No. SJf.</p> <p>Where the question involved in an appeal could have been adequately stated in two lines but occupied twenty nine lines, covering three-fourths of a page, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 34, the appeal was quashed.</p>

Judges: Brown, Fell, Mestrezat, Moschzisker, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.