Skip to main content
· 11/29/1909

Dufaur v. United States

Citations

  • 215 U.S. 615
  • 30 S. Ct. 405
  • 54 L. Ed. 350
  • 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1959

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \A claimant in a workmen's compensation proceeding has the burden of proving his claim.\
  • “As a ground for reversal the employer contends that the instant claim of the widow of Fred T. Staubs is barred by the doctrine of res judicata . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.