Skip to main content
· 11/9/1959

Dudley v. Zappa

Citations

  • 24 F.R.D. 427
  • 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ordering dismissal to be without prejudice: ‘The dismissal of the claims against Mr. Gumbaytay pursuant to Rule 25 did not act as an adjudication on the merits”
  • [a 2 Plaintiff also argues—without citing to any statute or legal precedent—that “by consenting to the amendment of Plaintiff’s Complaint, Wells Fargo waived any defense it may have had under Rule 12(b)(6
  • “The main difference between [a motion for judgment on the pleadings and a motion to dismiss] is. that ,a motion for judgment on the pleadings is made after an answer and that answer may also be considered in deciding the motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Metzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.