· 5/4/1999
Dudley v. Eden
Citations
- 49 F. Supp. 2d 581
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7648
- 1999 WL 323001
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There was no reason for [the officer] to believe that removal of [plaintiffs] handcuffs was necessary to avoid a substantial risk of harm. Fbr example, the paramedic did not indicate that [plaintiff] would suffer additional harm if the handcuffs were not removed.”
- “There was no reason for [the officer] to believe that removal of [plaintiff’s] handcuffs was necessary to avoid a substantial risk of harm. For example, the paramedic did not indicate that [plaintiff] would suffer additional harm if the handcuffs were not removed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aldrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.