Skip to main content
· 5/4/1999

Dudley v. Eden

Citations

  • 49 F. Supp. 2d 581
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7648
  • 1999 WL 323001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There was no reason for [the officer] to believe that removal of [plaintiffs] handcuffs was necessary to avoid a substantial risk of harm. Fbr example, the paramedic did not indicate that [plaintiff] would suffer additional harm if the handcuffs were not removed.”
  • “There was no reason for [the officer] to believe that removal of [plaintiff’s] handcuffs was necessary to avoid a substantial risk of harm. For example, the paramedic did not indicate that [plaintiff] would suffer additional harm if the handcuffs were not removed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.