Skip to main content
· 6/28/1993

Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr. And Constance P. Godfrey v. United States

Citations

  • 997 F.2d 335
  • 145 A.L.R. Fed. 719
  • 72 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5320
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15503
  • 1993 WL 228081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an IRS database entry reflecting a “refund of overpayment” did not establish that a refund check had been issued and sent
  • holding that the presumption did not apply where the Government \failed to submit ... an authoritative explanation of IRS procedures which could provide a presumption of regularity\
  • proof of procedures followed in the regular course of operations raises presumption that document was properly addressed and mailed
  • a presumption exists that a mailing is received where there is “proof of procedures followed in the regular course of operations which give rise to a strong inference that the [correspondence] was properly addressed and mailed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.