· 6/28/1993
Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr. And Constance P. Godfrey v. United States
Citations
- 997 F.2d 335
- 145 A.L.R. Fed. 719
- 72 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5320
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15503
- 1993 WL 228081
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an IRS database entry reflecting a “refund of overpayment” did not establish that a refund check had been issued and sent
- holding that the presumption did not apply where the Government \failed to submit ... an authoritative explanation of IRS procedures which could provide a presumption of regularity\
- proof of procedures followed in the regular course of operations raises presumption that document was properly addressed and mailed
- a presumption exists that a mailing is received where there is “proof of procedures followed in the regular course of operations which give rise to a strong inference that the [correspondence] was properly addressed and mailed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.