· 11/24/2010
Dudenhoeffer v. Fifth Third Bancorp
Citations
- 757 F. Supp. 2d 753
- 50 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1353
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131967
- 2010 WL 4970767
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding “it makes little or no difference to the analysis that Plaintiffs allege that the price of [defendant’s] stock was artificially inflated during the class period due to its lending practices” and dismissing breach of fiduciary duty of prudence claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sandra S. Beckwith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.