Skip to main content
· 11/24/2010

Dudenhoeffer v. Fifth Third Bancorp

Citations

  • 757 F. Supp. 2d 753
  • 50 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1353
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131967
  • 2010 WL 4970767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “it makes little or no difference to the analysis that Plaintiffs allege that the price of [defendant’s] stock was artificially inflated during the class period due to its lending practices” and dismissing breach of fiduciary duty of prudence claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sandra S. Beckwith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.