· 3/22/2010
Dudek v. Thomas & Thomas Attorneys & Counselors at Law, LLC
Citations
- 702 F. Supp. 2d 826
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26772
- 2010 WL 1133868
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The purpose of a motion under either rule is to test the sufficiency of the complaint-not to decide the merits of the case.”
- “Despite this revision, Ohio courts continue to apply the original version of § 142.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kathleen McDonald O'Malley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.