Dudek v. Chester County Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that dismissal for a delay in revocation proceedings was not warranted but remanding the sentence to include credit for time served while waiting for the revocation hearing
• finding credit for time served an appropriate remedy for the 48 day and 18 day violations of the time limit set forth in W.R.Cr.P. 39 rather than issuing a dismissal with prejudice
• “Should a Rule 39(a)(2) violation require a remedy, we prefer to tailor that remedy to the circumstances of each case in light of the harm the rule was promulgated to prevent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).