Dudek, B. v. The Chester County Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring that an appellant preserve her challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentencing at the sentencing hearing or in a post-sentence motion
• requiring that challenges to the discretionary aspects of sentencing be preserved at sentencing or in a post- sentence motion
• noting that that “[o]bjections to the discretionary aspects of a sentence are generally waived if they are not raised at the sentencing hearing or in a motion to modify the sentence imposed”
• finding appellate failed to preserve challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence by failing to preserve issued in a post-sentence motion.
• “Objections to the discretionary aspects of a sentence are generally waived if they are not raised at the sentencing hearing or in a motion to modify the sentence imposed.”
• an appellant cannot cure the waiver of a sentencing claim by failing to raise it at sentencing or in a post-sentence motion by including the challenge in his Rule 1925(b) statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).