· 11/2/1978
Duda v. State Board of Pharmacy
Citations
- 38 Pa. Commw. 378
- 393 A.2d 57
- 1978 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a more recent, more specific statute \repealed by implication\ a more general statute
- “Repeal by implication arises only where language used in the later statute is irreconcilably repugnant to the provisions of the earlier statute so as absolutely to preclude a consonant construction of both.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman, Wilkinson, Menoeb, Rogers, Blatt, Disalle, MacPhail, Crumlish, Craig
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.