DuCom v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agent violated her duty of loyalty by taking the company’s master client list from the premises without authority
• Because the defendant failed to show that the amount of restitution ordered by the trial court was unsupported by any evidence, the order was affirmed.
• evidence sufficient to show computer theft where defendant employee copied employer’s data without authority
• where state’s trial evidence as to value was insufficient to support a felony theft conviction under OCGA § 16-8-12, the felony conviction was vacated and the case was remanded for misdemeanor sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).