· 10/21/1996
Duckworth v. Whisenant
Citations
- 97 F.3d 1393
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27305
- 1996 WL 566582
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “costs such as general copying, computerized legal research, postage, courthouse parking fees and expert witness fees, which are clearly nonrecoverable.”
- noting that costs for “computerized legal research” and “postage” are “clearly nonrecoverable” under Section 1920
- stating that “costs such as general copying” and “postage” are not clearly recoverable under Section 1920
- holding that postage expenses are \clearly nonrecoverable\
- stating that “parking fees . . . are clearly nonrecoverable” under § 1920
- affirming Judge Forrester’s award of attorneys’ fees and wholly incorporating his order as the appellate decision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forrester, Barkett, Dyer, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.