Skip to main content
· 10/21/1996

Duckworth v. Whisenant

Citations

  • 97 F.3d 1393
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27305
  • 1996 WL 566582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “costs such as general copying, computerized legal research, postage, courthouse parking fees and expert witness fees, which are clearly nonrecoverable.”
  • noting that costs for “computerized legal research” and “postage” are “clearly nonrecoverable” under Section 1920
  • stating that “costs such as general copying” and “postage” are not clearly recoverable under Section 1920
  • holding that postage expenses are \clearly nonrecoverable\
  • stating that “parking fees . . . are clearly nonrecoverable” under § 1920
  • affirming Judge Forrester’s award of attorneys’ fees and wholly incorporating his order as the appellate decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forrester, Barkett, Dyer, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.