Duckworth v. US EX REL. LOCKE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “new evidence” must be evidence that “is not merely cumulative”
• denying a Rule 60 motion despite the plaintiffs’ argument that a new report demonstrates that the attorney engaged in prosecutorial misconduct because the plaintiffs failed to “identify] any specific evidence in the report that pertains to Plaintiffs’ case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).