Skip to main content
· 9/23/1924

Duckwall v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 204 Ky. 442
  • 264 S.W. 1062
  • 1924 Ky. LEXIS 482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing dispute where the parties agreed to a protective order but disagreed whether in-house counsel, who provided unrebutted evidence that they were not engaged in competitive decision-making, could review protected materials
  • same in a patent infringement suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.