Ducker v. Bonar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that while “[o]n its face, [the] COT appeared to be a multiple employer death benefit-only welfare benefit plan . . . [o]verwhelming evidence refutes” that this was its actual purpose
• observing that “the evidence shows that the formal corporate structure of the various Benistar Entities had little meaning for the people involved” and “also shows that corporate entities were created and discarded at Mr. Carpenter’s direction when it suited his purposes”
• finding, in the 18 Doc. #183 at 6–30. 19 Doc. #221 at 9. criminal case against Carpenter, that he directly managed many “Benistar Entities,” including some named in the subpoena
• “The evidence also shows that corporate entities were created and discarded at Mr. Carpenter’s direction when it suited his purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).