Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 12/5/1988
Duck v. Jenkins
Citations
- 297 S.C. 136
- 375 S.E.2d 178
- 1988 S.C. App. LEXIS 185
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- an unchallenged finding of fact will not be disturbed by this Court on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Cureton, Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1965-08-05· cited 34×
- Rutledge v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-08-06· cited 26×
- Associate Management, Inc. v. E. D. Sauls Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-07-12· cited 18×
- Evans v. BruceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-10-28· cited 11×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. HarperCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-01-03· cited 8×
- Venable v. VenableSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-04-18· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.