Ducharme v. a & S RV CENTER, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring privity and holding that the “fact that an express warranty runs from the remote manufacturer to the purchaser does not create the requisite privity.”
• “Because A & S is entitled to summary judgment on the Dueharmes claims for breach of implied and express warranties, as well as revocation, the Ducharmes’s MCPA claim against A & S also fails.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).