DuBrutz v. Jessup
Citations
- 54 Cal. 118
Syllabus
<p>New Tbial—Speoifioatioií—Where on motion for new trial the verdict is objected to on the ground that the damages are-assessed in too great or too small a sum, it is a sufficient specification to say that the verdict in respect to said damages is not sustained by the evidence.</p> <p>Id.—In case of a substantial conflict in the testimony, the action of the Court below, in granting or refusing a new trial, will be sustained.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that O.C.G.A. § 19-6-2, involving divorce actions, authorizes recovery of attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation incurred on appeal
- “The trial judge has authority to enter an award of attorney fees to the wife’s attorney for services rendered upon the husband’s appeal in a divorce and alimony case. [Cit.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bench, Department, From
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.