Dubrowsky v. Estate of Perlbinder (In Re Dubrowsky)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the debtor changed bank accounts several times pre-bankruptcy to escape garnishment
• affirming bankruptcy court’s imposition of sanctions under Rule 9011 after denial of discharge pursuant to Section 727 for petitioners false and misleading statements in bankruptcy filings
• pointing out the debtor’s cavalier attitude with respect to his duties under the Code
• “[I]t is important to note that under section 727(a)(4)(A), a reckless indifference to the truth is sufficient to sustain an action for fraud.” (citations omitted)
• same, holding also, in particular, that “fraudulent intent may be inferred from a series of incorrect statements contained in the schedules”
• “[I]t is important, to note that under section 727(a)(4)(A), a reckless indifference to the truth is sufficient to sustain an action for fraud.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).