Skip to main content
· 2/4/1988

Dubow v. Dragon

Citations

  • 746 S.W.2d 857
  • 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 717
  • 1988 WL 28986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that summary judgment was proper on buyers’ claims because record established that buyers relied on independent inspection and not on sellers’ misrepresentations
  • holding that buyers of house with faulty foundation could not recover against sellers under consumer protection act where buyers hired inspector who informed them of foundation problems prior to closing and buyers decided to go ahead with purchase anyway
  • holding that buyers of house with faulty foundation could not recover against sellers under consumer protection act where buyers hired inspector who informed them of foundation problems prior to closing and buyers decided to go ahead with purchase anyway
  • when trial court order does not specify grounds for granting summary judgment, appellate court will affirm if any theories advanced are meritorious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Enoch, Whitham, McClung

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.