Dubonnet v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting qualified immunity when an officer shot a dog as “several large dogs ran out aggressively charging, barking and growling” and plaintiffs offered no contradicting evidence
• “Circuit courts routinely find that the killing of an individual’s pet can constitute a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).