Dubois v. Abrahamson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e may not read additional terms into, or modify, the plain language of a statute.”
• “[W]e may not read additional terms into, or modify, the plain language of a statute . . . .”
• court will not read into statute a limitation the plain language does not suggest
• court will not read into statute a limitation the plain language does not suggest
• “[T]he General Assembly could have drafted section 16-22-102(3) to define ‘convicted’ as ‘having received, and failed to successfully complete, a 5 deferred judgment and sentence,’” but it did not.
• appellate courts may not read additional terms into, or modify, a statute’s explicit language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).