Skip to main content
· 4/8/1994

Dubinka v. Judges of Superior Court of State of California

Citations

  • 23 F.3d 218
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2476
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 4688
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “But even if appellants are correct that some applications of [the state ballot initiative] are unconstitutional, the discovery provisions are not so ‘flagrantly and patently’ unconstitutional as to invoke federal jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.