Skip to main content
· 6/12/1990

Dubied MacHinery Co. v. Vermont Knitting Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 739 F. Supp. 867
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7155
  • 1990 WL 81342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding defendant was on notice because plaintiff framed motion as one for both judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment
  • counterclaims relating to item not replevied could not serve as a defense to replevy of another item
  • “It is permissible to label a response to a plaintiff’s cause of action as both an affirmative defense and as a counterclaim.”
  • party is entitled to judgment on pleadings “ ‘only if it has established that no material issue of fact remains to be resolved and that [it] is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leisure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.