Dubertrand v. Laville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because Jacked Up has offered no evidence that Janik assessed the validity of the Sara Lee Pro Forma and because Jacked Up has failed to establish a factual basis for Janik’s assumptions, the Court concludes that Janik’s opinions are inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).