Dubea v. Sch. Bd. of Avoyelles Parish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \monopoly power\ in the context of a section 2 claim \is typically proven by defining a relevant market and showing that the defendant has a dominant share of that market\
• “Absent direct proof of supracompetitive prices, monopoly power is typically proven by defining a relevant market and showing that the defendant has a dominant share of that market.”
• “Rule of reason analysis typically requires a plaintiff to show that the defendants’ actions enhanced market power ... [,] which in turn requires some economic analysis of the relevant market.” (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).