· 8/24/1984
Duane SWITZER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 742 F.2d 382
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19200
- 6 Soc. Serv. Rev. 270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the Secretary’s use of only the portions of a doctor’s report that favored her position to be improper
- reversing where denial rested on excerpts of an uncontradicted medical report that, in full, revealed severe impairments
- “[T]he Secretary’s attempt to use only the portions [of a report] favorable to her position, while ignoring other parts, is improper.”
- “Th[e] report is uncontradicted and the Secretary's attempt to use only the portions favorable to her position, while ignoring other parts, is improper.”
- “Th[e] report is uncontradicted and the Secretary's attempt to use only the portions favorable to her position, while ignoring other parts, is improper.”
- “Th[e] report is uncontradicted and the Secretary’s attempt to use only the portions favorable to her position, while ignoring other parts, is improper.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Cudahy, Flaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.