Duamutef v. Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing, inter alia, claims under § 1983 for malicious prosecution, retaliation, and conspiracy as barred by Heck, when the plaintiff’s underlying conviction had not been overturned
• dismissing § 1983 claims of malicious prosecution, false arrest, perjury, retaliation, and civil rights conspiracy under Heck where the plaintiff's underlying conviction had not been overturned
• “The gravamen of plaintiff's complaint is that he was ‘framed’ for a murder he did not commit in retaliation for his political involvements. . .As required by Heck, these claims will be dismissed.”
• “[A] claim for abuse of process accrues at such time as the criminal process is set in motion . . . against the plaintiff” but not “before such time as plaintiff is aware, or ought to be aware, of those facts providing a basis for his claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).