Dual v. Lockheed Martin Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s motion to dismiss amounted to a motion for summary judgment when the record revealed that the trial court “considered factual matters, placed before it by the parties, beyond those alleged in the complaint or amended complaint”
• holding that the fraudulent concealment theory may serve to toll the statute of limitations where “(1) the plaintiff has been kept in ignorance of the cause of action by the fraud of the adverse party, and (2
• applying the continuation of events theory in an action brought against government contractor by subcontractor alleging, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty
• stating that, when factual allegations are presented beyond those alleged in the complaint, and consideration of same is not excluded expressly by the judge, the facial grant of a motion to dismiss will be treated for purposes of appellate review as the grant of summary judgment
• three-year statute of limitations for quantum meruit claims where “ ‘remedy sought in equity is analogous to a remedy cognizable at law’ ”
• “[t]he powers granted to directors-trustees by § 3-515 clearly are intended only for the ‘winding up’ of a corporation’s affairs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).