Skip to main content
· 6/8/2005

DSL Internet Corp. v. TigerDirect, Inc.

Citations

  • 907 So. 2d 1203
  • 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8498
  • 2005 WL 1338111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the against-the-drafter rule is a rule of last resort and is inapplicable if there is evidence of the parties’ intent
  • “The construction-against-the-drafter principle is a rule of last resort and is inapplicable when there is evidence of the parties’ intent at the time they entered into the contract.”
  • the against-the-drafter rule is a rule of last resort and is inapplicable if there is evidence of the parties’ intent
  • the against-the-drafter rule is a rule of last resort and is inapplicable if there is evidence of the parties' intent
  • “Florida law requires that a contract be interpreted against the drafter when the contract contains ambiguous terms.”
  • under Florida law, “[t]he construction-against-the-drafter princi- ple is a rule of last resort and is inapplicable when there is evidence of the parties’ intent at the time they entered into the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green and Ramirez, Jj., and Schwartz, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.