· 6/8/2005
DSL Internet Corp. v. TigerDirect, Inc.
Citations
- 907 So. 2d 1203
- 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8498
- 2005 WL 1338111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the against-the-drafter rule is a rule of last resort and is inapplicable if there is evidence of the parties’ intent
- “The construction-against-the-drafter principle is a rule of last resort and is inapplicable when there is evidence of the parties’ intent at the time they entered into the contract.”
- the against-the-drafter rule is a rule of last resort and is inapplicable if there is evidence of the parties’ intent
- the against-the-drafter rule is a rule of last resort and is inapplicable if there is evidence of the parties' intent
- “Florida law requires that a contract be interpreted against the drafter when the contract contains ambiguous terms.”
- under Florida law, “[t]he construction-against-the-drafter princi- ple is a rule of last resort and is inapplicable when there is evidence of the parties’ intent at the time they entered into the contract.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green and Ramirez, Jj., and Schwartz, Senior Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.