Skip to main content
· 12/19/2008

D.S.D. v. State

Citations

  • 997 So. 2d 1191
  • 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 19251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the passing of a thirty-^day window in which to sell a property disallowed, a broker from seeking a commission because “he was required to prove, not only that the agreement complied with General Statutes § 20-325a(b
  • commission not recoverable where broker could not prove he produced a buyer during effective term of listing agreement
  • commission not recoverable where broker could not prove he produced buyer during effective term of listing agreement
  • commission not recoverable where broker could not prove he produced a buyer during effective term of listing agreement
  • commission not recoverable where broker could not prove he produced a buyer during the effective term of listing agreement
  • listing agreement must “precipitate the services”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohen, Evander, Monaco

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.