Skip to main content
· 2/28/1997

Dsc Communications Corporation Dsc Technologies Corporation, and Cross v. Next Level Communications Thomas R. Eames Peter W. Keeler, and Cross

Citations

  • 107 F.3d 322
  • 41 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1969
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3703
  • 1997 WL 87749

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that broad form instruction could result in a verdict for the plaintiff even though the jury has not unanimously found the same trade secret
  • recognizing the same in the civil context
  • \[A] party who fails to raise an issue in its initial brief waives the right to review of that issue.\
  • “[A] party who fails to raise an issue in its initial brief waives the right to review of that issue.”
  • district court did not abuse discretion in denying injunctive relief after jury award of damages sufficiently compensated for the misappropriation
  • “After a three week trial, the jury found Eames, Keeler and Next Level liable for breach of contract, diversion of corporate opportunity, and misappropriation of trade secrets.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Smith, Duhé

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.