Skip to main content
· 1/19/1995

D.S. America (East), Inc. v. Chromagrafx Imaging Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 873 F. Supp. 786
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 859
  • 1995 WL 25265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to dismiss because parties' intention as to whether subsequent agreement acted as a novation could not be determined as a matter of law
  • “An affirmative defense must sufficiently apprise the opposing party of the nature of the defense, providing the opposing party with adequate notice of the relevant elements of the defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.