Dryvit System, Inc. v. Rushing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court properly declined to modify a restrictive covenant that included a broad geographic restriction and “‘no attempt to reasonably limit the [activity] restrictions”
• rejecting the proposition that “a broad geographical application [] automatically invalidate[s] a post-employment restraint”
• restrictive covenant is reasonable if not greater than is necessary to protect the employer
• agreement prohibiting employee from competing with employer in any manner with no geographic limitation clearly unreasonable
• restrictive covenant is reasonable if not greater than is necessary to protect the employer
• restrictive covenant is reasonable if not greater than is necessary to protect the employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).