Dryvit System, Inc. v. Rushing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court properly declined to modify a restrictive covenant that included a broad geographic restriction and “‘no attempt to reasonably limit the [activity] restrictions”
• rejecting the proposition that “a broad geographical application [] automatically invalidate[s] a post-employment restraint”
• restrictive covenant is reasonable if not greater than is necessary to protect the employer
• agreement prohibiting employee from competing with employer in any manner with no geographic limitation clearly unreasonable
• restrictive covenant is reasonable if not greater than is necessary to protect the employer
• restrictive covenant is reasonable if not greater than is necessary to protect the employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLC
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 190×
• Cambridge Engineering, Inc. v. Mercury Partners 90 BI, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-12-07· cited 93×
• Corroon & Black of Illinois, Inc. v. Magner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-06-05· cited 70×
• Lawrence & Allen, Inc. v. Cambridge Human Resource Group, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-09-26· cited 66×
• Hamer Holding Group, Inc. v. Elmore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-08-14· cited 60×
• Abbott-Interfast Corp. v. Harkabus
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-08-30· cited 55×
• Eichmann v. National Hospital & Health Care Services, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-10-18· cited 52×
• Service Centers of Chicago, Inc. v. Minogue
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-03-09· cited 50×
• Stamatakis Industries, Inc. v. King
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-12-31· cited 45×
• Agrimerica, Inc. v. Mathes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-05-22· cited 42×
• Arpac Corp. v. Murray
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-02-11· cited 40×
• John B. Wilson, D/B/A Pelican Trolling Speedometer v. Electro Marine Systems, Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 1990-10-18· cited 38×
• A. B. Dick Co. v. American Pro-Tech
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-09-24· cited 35×
• Jefco Laboratories, Inc. v. Carroo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-09-24· cited 33×
• Lawrence & Allen, Inc. v. Cambridge Human Res. Group, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-09-26· cited 31×
• Weitekamp v. Lane
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-09· cited 25×
• Cincinnati Tool Steel Co. v. Breed
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-08-14· cited 22×
• George S. May International Co. v. International Profit Associates
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-09· cited 22×
• Shapiro v. Regent Printing Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-12-28· cited 21×
• Telxon Corp. v. Hoffman
  N.D. Illinois· 1989-08-22· cited 15×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• House of Vision, Inc. v. Hiyane
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-03-29· cited 114×
• Bauer v. Sawyer
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1956-03-22· cited 102×
• Hursen v. Gavin
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1896-03-28· cited 58×
• Tower Oil & Technology Co. v. Buckley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-08-12· cited 53×
• Donald McElroy, Inc. v. Delaney
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-04-26· cited 53×
• Wolf & Co. v. Waldron
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-07-28· cited 37×
• Keep Productions, Inc. v. Arlington Park Towers Hotel Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-05-11· cited 31×
• Lawter International, Inc. v. Carroll
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-07-07· cited 24×