Drury v. Inhabitants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting disputed issues of fact as to whether the I-90 trail “could be used for recreation”
• “Whether land has been opened for recreation is to be viewed from the objective standpoint of the landowner.”
• Immunity does not turn on whether the landowner’s recreational purpose is “‘primary,’” “‘secondary,’” or “incidental.”
• test is whether the land was open for recreation “at all”
• statements made on website and by park officials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).