Drummond v. Commissioners of the Clinton & Port Hudson Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining removing defendant had to exercise reasonable diligence in determining whether co-defendants had been served, and remanding because removing defendant did not exercise such diligence
• Rule 25(d) provides “substitution only when a public officer is a ‘party in an official capacity’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).