Drummond v. City of Anaheim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officers’ alleged act of prolonged pressure onto detainee’s prone body as he lay on the ground handcuffed and gasping for air constituted excessive force
• holding that “no federal case directly on point [was needed] to establish” that the 20 conduct at issue violated clearly established law and constituted excessive force
• holding that “no federal case directly on point [was needed] to establish” that the 28 conduct at issue violated clearly established law and constituted excessive force
• holding that “no federal case directly on point [was needed] to establish” that the 28 conduct at issue violated clearly established law and constituted excessive force
• holding that “no federal 9 case directly on point [was needed] to establish” that the conduct at issue violated clearly 10 established law and constituted excessive force
• holding that two officers maintaining pressure on a prone positioned, mentally ill, handcuffed, and compliant individual “who was being taken into custody to prevent injury to himself” was not reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).