Skip to main content
· 1/15/1868

Drumm v. Sherman

Citations

  • 20 La. 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that if an agency opts to issue a new decision on remand, the new explanations are 12 “contemporaneous and, consequently, not post hoc”
  • noting that if an agency opts to issue a new decision on remand, the new explanations are 12 “contemporaneous and, consequently, not post hoc”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howekd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.