Druker v. Roland Wm. Jutras Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that defendants’ failure which may have caused plaintiff to pay higher premiums under late insurance contacts did not unduly impair the fulfilment of the contract at issue
• party not allowed unilaterally and without justification to “do anything which will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).