Drudge v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that supplemental evidence supporting an article 11.07 application for writ of habeas corpus should be filed in the trial court, not the reviewing court
• explaining that evidence will not be considered directly in this Court absent compelling and extraordinary circumstances
• observing that, after an application has been forwarded to this Court, “an applicant who wishes the convicting court and this Court to consider supplemental evidence should file these materials in the convicting court in the county of conviction” within specified time period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).