Skip to main content
· 12/17/1996

DRR, L.L.C. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Citations

  • 949 F. Supp. 1132
  • 27 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20794
  • 44 ERC (BNA) 1039
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19838
  • 1996 WL 756378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an “as is” clause does not “insulate a seller from suit for its fraudulent misrepresentations”
  • “the plaintiff here is not seeking to rescind the sales contract . . . Rather, as in Wo% this is an action in common law fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murray M. Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.