Droz v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• policy was not ambiguous when read as a whole; conversion clause was “physically set forth” under life insurance benefit and thus was “manifestly intended to refer to that category of insurance”
• “We are 14 mindful that in determining whether an ambiguity exists, the language must be considered 15 from the standpoint of one who is not trained in law or in the insurance business. Reading 16 the contract in its entirety, we find no ambiguity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).