Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Michigan Supreme Court· 7/20/1995

Drouillard v. Stroh Brewery Co.

Citations

  • 536 N.W.2d 530
  • 449 Mich. 293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the employer could coordinate a lump-sum pension distribution with worker’s compensation benefits where the employee had been “forced” to accept the pension distribution
  • holding that the employer could coordinate a lump-sum pension distribution with worker's compensation benefits where the employee had been \forced\ to accept the pension distribution
  • the purpose of § 354 “was to prevent duplicate wage-loss payments while maintaining suitable wage-loss benefits”
  • “[I]n the interpretation of statutes, effect must be given, if possible, to every word, sentence and section and, to that end, the entire act must be read to be an harmonious and consistent enactment as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyle, Brickley, Cavanagh, Levin, Mallett, Riley, Weaver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Drouillard v. Stroh Brewery Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.