Drouhard-Nordhus v. Rosenquist

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that summary judgment was appropriate in a malpractice case when the plaintiff failed to provide evidence of causation
• affirming grant of summary judgment based on lack of causation where evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship between the radiologist's alleged negligent diagnosis and the patient's death was speculative
• affirming grant of summary judgment based on lack of causation where evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship between the radiologist's alleged negligent diagnosis and the patient's death was speculative
• affirming summary judgment against plaintiff’s medical malpractice claim because plaintiff “fail[ed] to come forward with evidence that the patient would not have died but for [defendant’s] alleged breach of the standard of care”
• finding generalized references to be speculative and inadequate to meet plaintiff's causation burden
• district court required to resolve all facts and inferences that may reasonably be drawn from the evidence in favor of nonmoving party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).