Dronette v. Meaux Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Title VII “enabl[es] suit by any plaintiff with an interest arguably sought to be protected.”
• concluding that Thompson falls within the zone of interests protected by Title VII because he is a person aggrieved with standing to sue
• holding that an employee whose employment was terminated after his fiancée, a co-employee, filed a complaint with the EEOC had standing to pursue a Title VII retaliation claim
• holding that “third-party reprisals” can amount in some circumstances to retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq.
• finding that the filing of an EEOC charge is a protected activity under Title VII.
• finding that the fired spouse of an individual that filed a workplace discrimination complaint could bring a title VII retaliation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).