Skip to main content
· 9/19/1978

Federal Case

Citations

  • 582 F.2d 1336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court “misconstrued” the likelihood of success requirement to necessitate a showing that the union would prevail on the merits of its dispute
  • noting that, while lay-offs were taking place, the company was hiring 166 new, non-union employees in the division taking over the work of union employees who had been subject to lay-offs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.