Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \the threshold issue of timeliness’’ under both the CMPA and Rule 1 for filing a petition for review of a PERB decision \goes to the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction”
• stating that “the threshold issue of timeliness” under both the CMPA and Rule 1 for filing a petition for review of a PERB decision “goes to the trial court‟s subject matter jurisdiction”
• reviewing dismissal of a petition for review of a PERB decision as untimely without specifying the standard of review, implying that the court applied a de novo standard
• “Even if, on our own, we would reach a different conclusion from the PERB’s, we must defer to the PERB’s interpretation unless it is clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).