Driver v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding doctrine could apply when daughter, at time of accident, disobeyed parents’ instruction not to drive outside city limits
• “[I]f at the time of the accident it should be assumed that [the daughter/driver] was exceeding her authorized speed limit certainly it could not be contended that such disobedience relieved the father of liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maurillo v. Park Slope U-Haul
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-12-27· cited 64×
• Young v. Beck
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2011-04-05· cited 17×
• Anderson v. Mason
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2003-07-29· cited 13×
• Droussiotis v. Damron
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-07-16· cited 4×
• Young v. Beck
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-05-20· cited 3×
• Gummo ex rel. Gummo v. Ward
  M.D. Tennessee· 2014-10-29· cited 1×
• Mertis Johnson v. Willie Steverson
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-08-30
• Droussoitis v. Damrron
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-07-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Scates v. Sandefer
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1931-12-21· cited 24×
• Elkin Motor Co. v. Ragland
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1927-10-01· cited 17×
• Woodfin v. Insel
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1931-07-02· cited 12×
• Redding v. Barker
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1950-01-06· cited 11×
• Harber v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1956-03-31· cited 6×
• Burke v. North Vernon Lumber Mills
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1931-06-30· cited 2×